Æ: An Energy Process Paradigm for an Energy Trifecta & Reverting Global GHG Emissions Trends 

We are developing a Net+Positive Energy Reactor in line with our energy expansion paradigm (surpassing that of energy transition trilemma) . Our technology is seeking to not only halt CO₂ based climate change but we aim to reverse leveraging already existing energy vectors. If you, your VC, your climate (tech) philanthropy, would like to contribute at this stage, you could do it directly or for a quicker ROI please support us by buying our IHHT and IHHT+HOT training equipment, which currently has a pre-order discount and gain 1st row access to future funding rounds as an additional perk.

For a sneak peak on Net+Positive Energy paradigm and global roadmap to preindustrial Atmospheric CO₂ levels please look at the executive summary below.

Executive Summary:

• Net-Zero Energy “solutions” still emit greenhouse gases, trending to net-zero never reaches it. Replacing all current energy with net-zero energy will thus not solve net-zero emissions. (see Zeno Paradox Figure, ←left side)
• Net+Positive Energy solutions are the only viable ways to achieve net zero and beyond. (see Zeno Paradox Figure, right side →)
• FOSSIL FUELS ARE COMPATIBLE WITH BOTH NET+POSITIVE APPROACHES AND GLOBAL NET-ZERO EMISSIONS!
• A realistic Pareto adoption of current net-zero energy technologies will fail to stop current atmospheric CO₂ trends. Over 90% of the allocated R&D capital for net-zero has been misallocated (kind of wasted) in strategies deemed to fail from the start. Another 1 Trillion USD is estimated to be misallocated on updating to the clean fuels economy. Hard truth: the world seems to be using outdated strategies to try to stimulate "green" economic development (e.g. the old build unnecessary infrastructure approach).
• A realistic Pareto adoption of net+positive energy technologies would certainly achieve net-zero by 2050 with currently globally scaled energy vectors, hence the AII+X determination on continuing to develop our version of net+positive technology. The $1 Trillion USD could be invested for process adoption and net+positive technologies development particularly those with value-added effluents.
• The 1st message: The process not the fuel! 
• The 2nd message: Net+Positive energy processes are to EVs, as EVs are to the ICE vehicles!

Extended version: 

• More details are within Net+Positive Tech IP (in progress to be released). There it is explained how fossil fuels are compatible (and easily leveragable) with global net-zero emissions through Net+Positive Energy processes (and more).
• As our motto goes: AUT VIAM INVENIAM AUT FACIAM (to fund the tech development  &scaling)